|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Brian Morrow added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Does anyone know where you might be able to watch this? On tv or on the net?
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Brian Morrow added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Thanks ! I really don't want to pay for it though to be honest...
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
J.P. Barner added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Hopefully, Flowrestling will be there - at least we can watch it later. <smile>
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Brian: I appreciate your candor but let's put it in perspective. You're obviously a wrestling fan. Undoubtedly you'd love to see Pucillo v Herbert. You understand better than almost any sports fan in the nation what a great matchup this is. But you don't want to spend 9.95?
That's not a lot of money to watch a sporting event about which you're passionate. Think about all the women whom you've bought drinks in the past. Think about all the times you spent $10 on bad pizza. How many gifts have you bought for people about whom you didn't even care that cost you more than ten dollars? Ten dollars is a pittance to pay to view a sporting event about which you have a passion.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ken Maltry added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Quote from Hank Kornblut's post:
|
"Brian: I appreciate your candor but let's put it in perspective. You're obviously a wrestling fan. Undoubtedly you'd love to see Pucillo v Herbert. You understand better than almost any sports fan in the nation what a great matchup this is. But you don't want to spend 9.95?
That's not a lot of money to watch a sporting event about which you're passionate. Think about all the women whom you've bought drinks in the past. Think about all the times you spent $10 on bad pizza. How many gifts have you bought for people about whom you didn't even care that cost you more than ten dollars? Ten dollars is a pittance to pay to view a sporting event about which you have a passion."
|
I agree, I intend to cough up the $10.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ben Golden added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
What I don't like about it is that you have to sign up for a hole month and then cancel your subscription or it will sign you back up. I wish it would just let me pay a flat fee for the 1 event. I would watch their match against Iowa on Sunday but it's at the same time as tOSU vs. Wisconsin.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ken Maltry added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
I noticed that, too but I'll just have to remember to cancel.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
DJ Vondruska added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Anyone who paid for the service have updates?
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ethan Moore added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Ryan sends out a back up!
Man, I sat through this whole dual waiting for these 7 minutes. Very disappointing.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ethan Moore added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Pendleton? I'm not sure who he is.
I heard booing, I thought maybe Buckeye fans were yelling for Pucillo.
This sucks.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Ethan Moore added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Pucillo is wrestlng 97.
Logic? Why not have Pucillo wrestle Herbert? What can it hurt?
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Brad Proudfoot added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Quote from DJ Vondruska's post:
|
"Anyone who paid for the service have updates?"
|
It is 18-13 Northwestern with Pucillo wrestling at 197.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Mike Hojnacki added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Bucks sent out Owen Schaefer instead of Palmer. He lost and the dual had a much different look to it, especially with Johnstone losing in OT. Anyone know why they didn't put Palmer out?
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: Mike Pucillo v. Jake Herbert?
Brad Proudfoot added to this discussion on February 20, 2009
Pucillo got the pin. Ohio State is now up 19-18 going into 285.
|
|
|
|
|