|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Britt Malinsky added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
https://setonhallpirate.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/january-26th-2015-dual-impact-index-presented-by-the-national-collegiate-open/
Dual-Result: 8th
125: Tomasello 6th
133: DiJulius 4th
141: L. Stieber 1st, Marandino (76th)
149: M. Jordan (11th), Ryan (21st), Languis 53rd
157: Demas 4th, M. Jordan (10th), Languis (23rd), Burcher (57th), DeCarlo (70th)
165: B. Jordan 1st, Kresevic (49th)
174: Martin 13th, Harris (53rd), Prezzia (60th), Bresciani (61st)
184: Courts 21st, Rozema (56th), Fox (57th)
197: Snyder 4th, O'Hara (67th)
285: Tavanello 9th
p4p top 100: L. Stieber 1st, B. Jordan 2nd, DiJulius 33rd, Demas 38th, Snyder 41st, Tomasello 48th, Tavanello 80th
Tournament-Strength: 2nd
Dual-Component: 2nd
Roster-Component: 2nd
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Pat Altvater added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
Brit:
Please explain the content of the different rankings.
I see that you have Dual Result at 8th, but Dual Component at 2nd.
Please explain the difference between the two?
And how is roster component different from those?
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Britt Malinsky added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
|
Quote from Pat Altvater's post:
|
|
"Brit:
Please explain the content of the different rankings.
I see that you have Dual Result at 8th, but Dual Component at 2nd.
Please explain the difference between the two?
And how is roster component different from those?"
|
Dual-Result is based on the results of dual meets, with no attention paid to which wrestlers competed in those dual meets. Dual-Component is based on the ratings of the individual wrestlers, with no attention paid to the team scores of the dual meets or tournaments. Roster-Component is functionally the same as the Dual-Component, but is calculated as if everybody (all over the country) were pulled out of their redshirts.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Pat Altvater added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
|
Quote from Britt Malinsky's post:
|
|
"
|
Quote from Pat Altvater's post:
|
|
"Brit:
Please explain the content of the different rankings.
I see that you have Dual Result at 8th, but Dual Component at 2nd.
Please explain the difference between the two?
And how is roster component different from those?"
|
Dual-Result is based on the results of dual meets, with no attention paid to which wrestlers competed in those dual meets. Dual-Component is based on the ratings of the individual wrestlers, with no attention paid to the team scores of the dual meets or tournaments. Roster-Component is functionally the same as the Dual-Component, but is calculated as if everybody (all over the country) were pulled out of their redshirts."
|
Thanks Britt!
That makes sense.
So, the reason we have a difference from 2nd to 8th in these rankings is because if all our talent was healthy and wrestled to rank, that would represent the 'Dual - component' rank, which is 2nd in the country.
But, since OSU has been missing 2 to 3 of our higher ranked wrestlers in every match, and because of that we have lost 3 matches (albeit very close), the 'Dual-Result' recognizes those loses, even though several of our 1st teamers were not available for those losses.
In other words, the 'Dual Component' assumes the 'prime-time' guys were out there against every opponent.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Britt Malinsky added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
|
Quote from Pat Altvater's post:
|
|
"
|
Quote from Britt Malinsky's post:
|
|
"
|
Quote from Pat Altvater's post:
|
|
"Brit:
Please explain the content of the different rankings.
I see that you have Dual Result at 8th, but Dual Component at 2nd.
Please explain the difference between the two?
And how is roster component different from those?"
|
Dual-Result is based on the results of dual meets, with no attention paid to which wrestlers competed in those dual meets. Dual-Component is based on the ratings of the individual wrestlers, with no attention paid to the team scores of the dual meets or tournaments. Roster-Component is functionally the same as the Dual-Component, but is calculated as if everybody (all over the country) were pulled out of their redshirts."
|
Thanks Britt!
That makes sense.
So, the reason we have a difference from 2nd to 8th in these rankings is because if all our talent was healthy and wrestled to rank, that would represent the 'Dual - component' rank, which is 2nd in the country.
But, since OSU has been missing 2 to 3 of our higher ranked wrestlers in every match, and because of that we have lost 3 matches (albeit very close), the 'Dual-Result' recognizes those loses, even though several of our 1st teamers were not available for those losses.
In other words, the 'Dual Component' assumes the 'prime-time' guys were out there against every opponent."
|
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: January 26th, 2015 Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open
Casey Talbott added to this discussion on January 27, 2015
|
Britt:
I have the strong sense that you might be smarter than I am, or me is, or whatever.
See what I mean...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
