|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Alex Creech added to this discussion on February 23, 2017
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Steve Durose added to this discussion on February 23, 2017
Surprised at Big Ten only getting 5 at 285, when they currently have 6 ranked in the top 16.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Mark Niemann added to this discussion on February 23, 2017
Quote from Steve Durose's post:
|
"Surprised at Big Ten only getting 5 at 285, when they currently have 6 ranked in the top 16."
|
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Jason L. Jackson added to this discussion on February 23, 2017
Snyder may not have qualified a spot, given his lack of matches.
I believe the numbers were updated and the B1G gets 7 at 165. That gives Burcher a shot as well.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Mike Antenucci added to this discussion on February 24, 2017
This 285 thing is puzzling. B1G Ten gets 5, and MAC gets three. I hate to bang on the MAC as we have so many Ohio boys represented, but the MAC heavies are atrocious. They have not done well the past few years and this year's crop has nobody ranked inside top 25. Compare that to B1G Ten with 6 inside the top 25. Snyder not meeting requirements? He is 9-0, all DI opponents. No matter, the remaining slots will got to B1G Ten guys.
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: NCAA Qualifier Allocations
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on February 24, 2017
Big Ten will get at least one and probably two more heavies via Wild Cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|