|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: The Numbers Don't Lie
Dom Mancini added to this discussion on December 12, 2011
|
106 1146 8.55% 103 873 6.16%
113 931 6.95% 112 1011 7.13%
120 1224 9.13% 119 1273 8.98%
126 1275 9.51% 125 1363 9.62%
132 1351 10.08% 130 1194 8.42%
138 1320 9.85% 135 1203 8.49%
145 1326 9.90% 140 1118 7.89%
152 1140 8.51% 145 1030 7.27%
160 914 6.82% 152 1228 8.66%
160 947 6.68%
170 901 6.72%
182 653 4.87% 171 902 6.36%
195 470 3.51% 189 982 6.93%
220 468 3.49% 215 625 4.41%
285 281 2.10% 285 424 2.99%
OK wrestling world I don't have alot to say so what I will do is list the weight classes from hardest to easiest based on participants - remember the goal of NFHS was to spread out the participants so that there would be 7% in each weight class
132 10.08%
145 9.90%
138 9.85%
126 9.51%
120 9.13%
106 8.55% *
152 8.51%
113 6.95%
160 6.82%
170 6.72%
182 4.87%
195 3.51%
220 3.49%
285 2.10%
* this includes wrestlers who are underweight so the factor of percentage of actual kids that are true 106 pounders - I would guess is marginally lower
Once again my position on the weight class change was that it was a poor decision and not what is best for the kids - I don't see them changing them back or making corrections to the now flawed weight class system that we are stuck with . . . see you on the mats!
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: The Numbers Don't Lie
Mark Niemann added to this discussion on December 12, 2011
|
Are you saying they changed the weight classes!?!?! I'm so confused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
