|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Jared Ball added to this discussion on January 12, 2023
|
125: #9 Heinsleman/ Gonzales v #15 Peterson
133: #13 Mendes v Britton
141: D’Emilio v Oliveri
149: #5 Sasso v White
157: Gallagher v #21 Clark
165: Wilcox v Kanniard
174: #6 Smith v Turley
184: #5 Romero v #16 Soldano
197: Geoff? v Janzer
285: #18 Orndorf/ Missista v #22 McDermitt
Bucks host the Scarlett Knights on Sunday. Rutgers has been in the news this week due to the surprising news that Sammy Alvarez was no longer with the program. Rutgers pulls the RS off of Oliveri for the second year in a row. The Bucks lineup is likely to have questions as well. 125, 165, 197, and 285 are guesses. If Hoffman can’t go it’d be nice to get a look at Geog in action a week after he was supposed to start but did not. Soldano has been in the high light reels with his wild matches. 184 should be the match of the dual of 125 doesn’t materialize.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Rob Wagner added to this discussion on January 13, 2023
|
Looks like 141 may be the best match up as Oliveri should be ranked.
Soldano at 184 will be a good one for Rutgers in due time. I hope to see Romero show the freshman the ropes a bit here.
Edit: 157 Gallagher vs. Clark will be good as well. Need Paddy to get back on track & defeat a guy just outside the top 20.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Jack Muni added to this discussion on January 13, 2023
|
Per OSU website:
125-No. 8 Malik Heinselman (Sr.)or Andre Gonzales (r-Fr.)
165-No. 8 Carson Kharchla (r-Jr.) or Isaac Wilcox (Jr.)
197-Gavin Hoffman (r-Sr.)
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Roe Fox added to this discussion on January 13, 2023
|
Family obligation this weekend (my birthday Saturday). Two tickets available. PM me a mobile number if you want them.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Matt Schein added to this discussion on January 15, 2023
|
Ok, maybe it’s just the beer talking, but why in god’s name is Ohio state forfeiting 174? Did they not have another one? I know it didn’t matter in the long run, but it is a bad look when a university of 65,000 is forfeiting any weight class
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Doug Gainous added to this discussion on January 15, 2023
|
Romero crunching his last two opennents pleases me.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Jared Ball added to this discussion on January 15, 2023
|
Pure speculation but I wonder if it was a late scratch. Gavin Brown was out on the mat for the line ups/handshakes. Smith definitely wasn’t.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on January 16, 2023
|
|
Quote from Matt Schein's post:
|
|
"Ok, maybe it’s just the beer talking, but why in god’s name is Ohio state forfeiting 174? Did they not have another one? I know it didn’t matter in the long run, but it is a bad look when a university of 65,000 is forfeiting any weight class"
|
Yep. You've got a pretty good paying crowd in attendance. Have someone take the mat.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Hank Kornblut added to this discussion on January 16, 2023
|
I love Jesse Mendes. He's a baller on the mat. Seven minutes of focus, intensity and excellent technique.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Don Bork added to this discussion on January 16, 2023
|
Romero looked good, as he has all season. The young stud, Soldano, was looking to upset the higher ranked, more experienced senior in the first match of the dual. I’m guessing Rutgers wanted that as the lead off match. Soldano does look like an excellent young wrestler, but was “taken to school” by Romero.
Also, less concerned about no bout at 174, more concerned as to why. Hoping not another injured Buckeye.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Topic: 1/15 OSU v Rutgers
Brady Hiatt added to this discussion on January 17, 2023
|
|
Quote from Doug Gainous's post:
|
|
"Romero crunching his last two opennents pleases me."
|
Me too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
